Section 21 SeilbG requires a concession before a public cableway is built and operated. Check the application documents, authority and further permits.
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for ski and alpine accidents
Ski and alpine accidents are complex and emotional. One lawyer you know, from the first question to the courtroom. Strong practical background (former ski instructor, mountain rescuer and dog handler).
In larger cases, the work is handled as a team (lawyer, trainee lawyer, legal assistant). Court hearings and negotiations always remain a matter for the lead lawyer.
Section 21 of the Austrian Cableway Act 2003 (Seilbahngesetz 2003, SeilbG) makes a concession a prerequisite for the construction and operation of a public cableway. The concession therefore has to be addressed before construction begins. The wording of section 21 in the Austrian Legal Information System states this expressly.
The concession is one step in the approval process. The BMIMI also lists a construction permit and an operating permit after construction or conversion work. The requirements for a new project depend in part on the system type and the competent authority.
This article explains the approval route for a new public cableway. The cableway and lift operators topic page covers related questions. Renewing an existing concession and liability during operation are separate issues.
Identify the intended use and the current procedure stage. This assessment does not replace a review of the project file or the authority’s jurisdiction.
Would you like to discuss your cableway project? Continue to the enquiry form.
If its legal classification is uncertain, choose "Not sure". This assessment does not classify the installation for the authority.
Section 21 of the Austrian Cableway Act 2003 (Seilbahngesetz 2003, SeilbG) links the concession requirement to a public cableway. A project label or ownership structure does not settle the classification. Give the competent authority the purpose, intended users, access arrangements, technical type and operating concept.
Until the classification is confirmed, do not treat this short assessment as proof that no approval is needed.
For a public cableway, the concession under section 21 SeilbG is a prerequisite for construction and operation. First confirm the competent authority and the legal classification. The published BMIMI checklist asks, among other items, for a project description, technical plans, a construction and operating programme, cost and financing evidence, and proof of public interest.
The checklist is extensive and depends on the project. Start with documents that clearly identify the location, route, affected land and proposed service.
Review the concession decision for its scope, project description, conditions and time limits. The BMIMI lists separate steps for construction and later operating approval. A concession alone does not establish that every technical construction requirement has been met.
Compare the approved project with the planned works and confirm any construction permit before building starts.
The BMIMI states that an operating permit follows construction or conversion work if there are no concerns regarding the safety and proper order of cableway operations and traffic. Gather completion records and the documents required for the safety assessment, then wait for the required permit.
Collect the concession, construction permit, operating permit and later amendment decisions. Compare the approved route, stations, technical design and operating conditions with the installation as it exists. This assessment does not reach a retrospective conclusion about the legality of a particular operation.
Section 21 SeilbG links the concession to a public cableway. The system type and planned service should therefore be described at an early stage. The BMIMI application checklist asks for the purpose of the cableway and the local conditions. A short project label cannot replace that information.
If it is unclear whether the planned service falls within the public-cableway category, ask the competent authority to confirm the classification. Explain who will be carried, how access will work, which route and stations are planned, and how the system will operate. Ownership or a marketing description alone is not a reliable basis for assuming an exemption.
Under section 21 SeilbG, a concession is required before a public cableway can be built and operated. The provision also states that the concession establishes the cableway’s public-benefit status, described in the German text as "Gemeinnützigkeit". See the official text of section 21 SeilbG.
For a new project, the concession is a central part of legal market access and must be addressed before construction. It does not replace the technical assessment of the detailed design. Safety requirements for putting the completed installation into service are considered in a separate step.
The application should set out the proposed purpose, location, route and construction and operating programme. These details correspond to the documents listed in the ministry’s concession guidance.
The BMIMI page on concession applications names Department IV/E 6, the Supreme Cableway Authority, as the filing office. The ministry’s jurisdiction overview also describes responsibilities by cableway type and says that the concession is granted by the federal ministry or the relevant provincial governor, depending on jurisdiction.
Confirm the competent authority for the specific system before filing. The BMIMI overview of the Supreme Cableway Authority sets out its remit. This matters especially where a project involves more than one cableway type or also requires procedures concerning land, forestry, the environment or traffic.
The ministry lists responsibilities for funicular, reversible, gondola and combined cableways, as well as concession and construction-permit procedures for chairlifts. Do not apply that list to a different system without checking. If the route is uncertain, ask the authority to confirm the correct filing office before completing the application file.
The published BMIMI checklist includes, among other items, the company’s articles and company-register extract, accounts for the previous three financial years or an opening balance sheet, and a detailed project description. That description should identify the location, station sites, route and purpose of the installation.
For technical and operational review, the ministry asks for a preliminary or full construction design and a construction and operating programme, including operating conditions and restrictions. The file also includes project costs supported by firm offers, a viability forecast, a financing plan, and information about affected land and its availability.
Depending on the project, the authority also needs information about affected municipalities, traffic and parking, environmental and landscape protection, forestry, avalanche safety and the public interest. The ministry gives tourism and ski-school statements as examples of public-interest evidence. Its checklist also specifies criminal-record certificates for authorised company representatives that are no more than three months old. Review the full BMIMI document list for the specific installation; this summary is not a complete filing list.
The BMIMI requires a viability forecast and a financing plan that matches the project costs. The forecast should explain expected revenue, average passenger numbers and expenditure. The application must include evidence of both equity and borrowed funds, and the ministry requires the documents to be reviewed and signed by a qualified professional.
The BMIMI checklist says that, as a general rule, at least 50 per cent of the total investment for a new public cableway should be covered by equity, with reference to section 5 SeilbG. The qualification "as a general rule" matters when preparing a project-specific structure. Document the source and viability of the full financing and clarify the treatment of leasing or other arrangements before filing.
An equity contribution on its own does not guarantee that a concession will be granted. The authority assesses the complete project, its viability and the other statutory requirements.
The concession, construction permit and operating permit have different functions. The BMIMI explains the requirements for construction and operation separately. It lists a construction permit for building and certain changes. The required documents must be available, including the stated requirements for the safety report and safety analysis. After construction or conversion work, an operating permit follows if there are no concerns about the safety and proper order of cableway operations and traffic.
The ministry describes specific exemptions and conditions for certain minor additions and modifications. Those rules should not be applied to a new cableway without checking the exact project. Confirm the installation type, scope, conditions and required approvals with the competent authority.
A concession does not decide every liability issue arising during operation. Separate questions include responsibility for unattended cableway systems and mountain-bike transport by cableway. Those issues are distinct from the concession requirement for a new public installation.
Ownership alone does not provide a reliable answer. Section 21 SeilbG links the concession to a public cableway, so the intended service and the actual system type matter. Confirm the classification with the competent authority before relying on an exemption.
The published BMIMI checklist lists the documents for a concession application. Ask the competent authority in advance whether a specific report may be submitted later. Refer to the particular document and project when making that enquiry.
The BMIMI information pages linked here do not give a general processing time. A realistic schedule depends in part on the system type, the competent authority and whether the file is complete. Ask the responsible authority for a project-specific estimate.
The sooner we secure the evidence, the better we can enforce your claim. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152