Has land beneath a ski piste been sold? Check the register entry, easement deed, plans and any lease before relying on continued use.
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for ski and alpine accidents
Ski and alpine accidents are complex and emotional. One lawyer you know, from the first question to the courtroom. Strong practical background (former ski instructor, mountain rescuer and dog handler).
In larger cases, the work is handled as a team (lawyer, trainee lawyer, legal assistant). Court hearings and negotiations always remain a matter for the lead lawyer.
When the land beneath a ski piste is sold, the private legal basis determines whether and how the operator may continue using the affected plots. A registered easement, a lease entered in the land register and a personal use agreement have different effects.
Read the current land-register extract alongside the deed, plans and contract. Together they identify the burdened land, the person entitled and the activities covered by the legal title.
Classify the land-register extract or agreement first. This guide offers initial guidance; the entry, underlying instrument, contract and handover determine the result.
Would you like to discuss the documents? Go to the enquiry form.
The label ski-piste right does not settle the legal classification. Check the register entry, underlying instrument and contract.
Section 481(1) ABGB generally requires registration to acquire an easement over property entered in the public registers. Check the affected parcels, the beneficiary and the deed. The current entry shows the recorded burden; the title and section 484 ABGB define the purpose and scope of use.
Under section 1095 ABGB, a lease entered in the public registers is treated as a real right for the remaining term, which the subsequent owner must accept. Review the entry, parties, land area, agreed use and remaining term alongside the contract.
Section 1120 ABGB applies where the owner has sold the property and handed it over to the purchaser. If the lease is not entered in the public registers, the tenant must yield to the new owner after due notice. The tenant may seek compensation from the landlord for loss and lost benefits. Check the contract type, handover and notice against the documents.
A personal permission, operating agreement or incomplete set of documents cannot be classified by its label alone. Review the wording, parties, term, transfer or consent clauses, amendments, current register extracts, site plan and handover record. Section 481(2) ABGB sets how an easement over unregistered land and buildings is acquired. The official note to section 481(1) records a narrow Tyrol exception for certain rights of way and water-pipeline easements; it creates no general exception for ski-piste use rights.
The label “ski-piste right” in a sale agreement or operating description does not settle the legal classification. Obtain a current land-register extract, the instrument referred to by any entry and the relevant site plan. Compare the parcel numbers with the piste, access routes and areas used for installations.
Under section 481(1) ABGB, an easement over property entered in the public registers is generally acquired by registration. Section 481(2) contains rules for unregistered land and buildings. If no matching entry appears, identify the land and the asserted legal basis before drawing a conclusion.
Check Tyrol separately: The official note to section 481(1) ABGB records an exception for certain rights of way and water-pipeline easements. It does not create a general exception for every ski-piste use right. The location, route and legal basis matter.
A valid easement that remains in force continues to burden the land after sale. The purchaser must respect it within its current scope; the ownership change alone leaves the land-register entry in place.
Check that the entry covers the parcels being sold and that the recorded beneficiary or dominant land matches the current operator. Later amendments, a deletion, a time limit or a court order may also affect the present position. The sale contract between vendor and purchaser does not replace that review.
Section 484 ABGB limits exercise of an easement by its nature and purpose. The holder may not extend it. Read the purpose, the affected parcels, the route and the plan rather than relying on the word “piste” alone.
List each activity the operator needs and match it against the deed and plan. Record any uncertainty before moving a route or installing equipment.
Classify a personal agreement from its terms, registration and parties. Check whether it is legally a lease, whether it was entered in the public registers and which party it names.
Under section 1095 ABGB, a registered lease is treated as a right in rem for its remaining term and the subsequent owner must respect it. Section 1120 ABGB addresses an unregistered lease. If the leased property is sold and handed over to the purchaser, the tenant must yield to the new owner after due notice. The tenant may claim full compensation from the landlord for loss suffered and profit lost.
Those rules concern leases. A separate permission, operating agreement or personal consent needs its own review. The contract and circumstances determine transferability, consent requirements, term and the effect of a change in ownership.
Set out the current land-register extract, the easement deed and plans, the affected parcel numbers, the lease or use agreement with its amendments, and handover records. List the routes and activities claimed by the operator and compare each with the title. This makes it easier to raise a specific issue with the vendor, purchaser or contracting party.
Section 523 ABGB distinguishes a claim by a person asserting an easement from an owner’s claim against an alleged interference. A claimant seeking recognition of an easement must prove its acquisition or at least possession of the right in rem. An owner seeking to prevent an encroachment must prove the interference with the owner’s property. The appropriate claim therefore depends on the party’s position and evidence.
Private rights to use land must also be reviewed separately from public-law operating requirements. The separate article “Public Cableway in Austria: Concession Before Construction and Operation” covers the concession. A construction-site obstruction raises a different issue; see “Summer slope construction site: liability for pits, machinery, fences and hiking paths”.
The sooner we secure the evidence, the better we can enforce your claim. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152